September 7th, 2009

China on your Desktop… Goodbye Wallmart

Posted in Philosophy, Punk Capitalism, Remix by sabotosh

RepRap from Adrian Bowyer on Vimeo.

RepRap from Adrian Bowyer on Vimeo.

August 20th, 2009

Don’t Run your Brand Ads on Yahoo Video!

An interesting thing happens on Yahoo Video when you disable the safe search function and search on “adult” type keywords. Porn videos and adjacent Brand Ads from multiple AdNets. Advertisers and AdNets beware of cheap inventory, you may just be getting what you pay for.

specific-ford

specific-ford-2

August 20th, 2009

Oprah and Dr Oz sue over Belly Fat Ads… Obey!

It looks like Oprah and Dr. Oz want their cut of belly fat ad revenue….. You know the ones you contacted your support rep at all the adnets to block form your site.

Hopefully Oprah and Dr. Oz will NOT go after the AdNets (most all of them ran some variation of this campaign) that facilitated these ads running on pretty much every website on the interwebs January – March 2009.

msnbc3

As of 8/20 there are no more Oprah endorsed Belly Fat Ads on MSNBC – but Rachael Ray is still fair game I guess.

msnbc5

Update: Adotas has a good article with more details here..

August 20th, 2009

That’s the way I roll…

Posted in Punk Capitalism, Ramblings by sabotosh

graf

August 16th, 2009

JZ + The Beatles + Danger Mouse = Copyright Infringement Never sounded so good!

August 16th, 2009

Pirate’s Dilemma by Matt Mason – what if pirates are good for capitalism?

Pirates dilemma chronicles 30 years remix through deb, hip hop, punk, and the personal computer movement; this is a must read.

July 18th, 2009

Let’s do a test, next time I have a $1,000,000 budget.

April 19th, 2009

Greed is Good, Part two.

April 19th, 2009

Are Ad Networks on the brink of Extinction?

Posted in Online Advertising by sabotosh

A colleague asked this the other day in response to an article from Adotas of the same name. Now if you have worked in the online ad space especially the remnant ad space it is easy to dismiss this argument as pie-in-the-sky. Sure every site would love to run direct ads and cut out the networks 30-60% technology fee but every site does not have a full time sales staff to put together these deals.

Even the larger sites that do have the resources for ad sales staff and have the luxury of being in premium verticals cannot always sell all their impression inventory and this is where the ad network and/or ad exchange comes into play. Most all publishers turn to ad networks to fill remnant impressions at some point.

On the advertiser side, ad networks / exchanges offer the advertiser the ability to run ads on premium publishers at prices pennies on the dollar of what they would have to pay running directly. Advertisers are also able to find strong performing sites and channels of aggregated sites that they might now have thought of. In this way ad networks deliver value to both advertisers and publishers.

Now this value proposition between ad networks, publishers, and advertisers works pretty well until an advertiser or an agency finds their brand clients ads running on a porn site. This was not as much of an issue in the past with direct response ads – sure ad networks and (DR) advertisers did not condone this practice; but it wasn’t going to get anyone sued and when these publishers were identified they were terminated from the responsible ad network.

In 2008 the game has changed, we are seeing more and more brand advertising coming online. Now advertisers and agencies are demanding full site disclosure from ad networks in order to protect their brands. What the advertisers may not know is that most all premium publishers have NDA’s in place with the networks they work with to protect their rate card. If an advertiser can buy inventory indirectly on premium sites for $0.50 – $2.50 CPM – why would they spend $5 – $40 CPM on a direct buy? The answer is they won’t. So at the end of the day we have advertisers that need to protect their brands and ad networks that need to protect their premium publishers.

So are networks / exchanges on the brink of extinction?, yes they are. At least the ones that do not provide a safe place for their advertisers and do not provide transparency to their partners. This does not have to be full site disclosure but ad networks need to provide their advertisers the ability to gain insight into where ads are actually running and publishers with transparency into what ads are running on thier site.

[UPDATE 8/22/2019]
All the ad networks have died, all the SSP’s and DSP’s have been consolidated / acquired into a handful of media companies.

April 19th, 2009

How do Malicious Ads get on Premium Ad Networks?

Posted in Online Advertising, Online Exchanges by sabotosh

So there are a few different kinds of display ad networks out there. This would include: general banner ad networks, advanced targeting ad networks, and exchanges.

The Ad Network world is certainly in a state of flux and these definitions are changing – but the general banner ad networks business model concentrates on performance type CPA (DR) offers. What this means is that they serve a whole lot of ads with a whole lot of offers for “Free Florida Vacations”. These networks are shall we say more liberal with the types of advertisers and publishers they work with.

The advanced targeting networks business model concentrates on highly targeted Brand type offers. This type of network generally offers very high CPM (high for remnant at least) but lower fill since they are only able to monetize qualified traffic. These networks generally are more restrictive in terms of the advertisers and publishers they work with because they need to be to work with premium partners to command premium rates.

The exchange is where all these networks collide; and indeed most all ad networks participate in some way with exchanges be it with MSN, RightMedia, and/or DoubleClick. It is in this marketplace where premium ad networks can be exposed to the more flexible policies of the general banner ad networks if they are buying and selling inventory. This issue is much worse when it is the exchange in questions policy not to provide adequate transparency between the advertiser, network, and publishers partners.